FSIFSI

  • MY CART
    No products in cart.
  • HOME
  • MASTERS
  • INTERNSHIPS
  • NEWS
  • FSI JOBS
  • FSI LAB
LEARNING PLATFORM
  • Home
  • Paper of the week
  • Acceleration Intensity and Repeat Sprint Task Design

News

Acceleration Intensity and Repeat Sprint Task Design

by FSI / Friday, 03 April 2020 / Published in Paper of the week

INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE

The quantification of accelerations have been used to overcome the limitations of speed-based monitoring. For instance, players’ accelerations have been categorized based on intensity thresholds (such as the number of accelerations >2 m·s−2) (Buchheit et al., 2014). The physiological demands in a repeated sprint exercise (RSE) are considered to be mainly affected by acceleration intensity when running distance has been maintained constant. Previous evidence has reported that faster accelerations involve higher metabolic (e.g. lactate, RPE, and HR) and mechanical (e. g. dynamic stress load [DSL]) demands than less intense accelerations. However, such demands have not been clearly described in the literature and, therefore, a lack of data examining this topic exists.

“Previous evidence has reported that faster accelerations involve higher metabolic (e.g. lactate, RPE, and HR) and mechanical (e. g. dynamic stress load [DSL]) demands than less intense accelerations”

It has been recognized that the integration of both external and internal training load parameters may offer a better comprehension of the players’ training load. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of accelerations with different intensities (e.g. maximal and submaximal) on external and internal load parameters in soccer. Considering, the limited evidence about this argument, the aim of this study was to compare the acceleration contribution to training load indicators during a standardized RSE protocol in soccer players.

“The aim of this study was to compare the acceleration contribution to training load indicators during a standardized RSE protocol in soccer players”

METHODS

16 soccer players were included (mean ± SDs: age 21 ± 1 years; weight 71.1 ± 7.7 kg). RSE was 3 sets of 7 × 30 m sprints with 25 s and 3 min recovery between sprints and sets, respectively. RSE was performed using two protocols requiring either 10 m maximal acceleration (2.12 m·s−2 [RSE-MA]) or 10 m submaximal acceleration (1.66 m·s−2 [RSE-SA]). Global positioning systems (10 Hz; STATSports, Viper) were utilized to collect: high speed running (HSR), dynamic stress load (DSL), Heart Rate (HR) peak, time >85% HR peak, respiratory (RPEres) and muscular (RPEmus) rating of perceived exertion.

RESULTS

RSE-MA reported a higher load compared to RSE-SA in the following variables (Table 1): HSR (p = 0.037), DSL (p = 0.027), HR peak (p = 0.025), Time > 85% HR peak (p = 0.028), RPEres (p < 0.001), and RPEmus (p = 0.001), but no differences were found in Time > 75% HR peak (p = 0.826) or metabolic power (p = 0.519) (table 1).

Table 1. Summary of between differences of RSE-MA and RSE-SA (n = 16). Data are presented in mean±SDs.

RSE = Repeated sprint exercise; MA = Maximal accelerations; SA = Submaximal accelerations; SDs = Standard Deviations; CI = Confidence intervals; HR = Heart rate, HSR = High speed running; DSL = Dynamic stress load; RPEres = Respiratory rating of perceived exertion; RPEmus = Muscular rating of perceived exertion; bpm = beats per minute; m = metres; s = seconds, W = watt, AU = arbitrary units. * = Significant difference between RSE-MA and RSE-SA (p < 0.05).

FSI STATEMENTS

  1. Given that “acceleration intensity” is a crucial contributor to the external and internal load training demands of RSE in soccer, this variable should be controlled/monitored by researchers and practitioners.
  2. Regarding external load, you have not found a difference (trivial) between RSE-MA and RSE-SA in “metabolic power”, despite finding differences in the other measured variables. Be cautious about obtaining indirectly “metabolic power” variable, since it is highly related to the total distance traveled and the relative speed, but could not respond to changes in acceleration intensity.
  3. Focusing on contextualized game scenarios, when soccer player accelerates to gain ball possession, performs at maximum (or close to this) intensity. According to the authors, practitioners should design RSE exercises where “all-out” accelerations are requested to generate high external and mechanical load, which can stimulate greater physiological responses and adaptations.

About FSI

What you can read next

FSI Football Science Update
FSI Football Science Update
FSI Football Science Update

Search

Recent Posts

  • Renewal agreement FSI-Boavista FC with Kinexon partnership

    Football Science Institute (FSI) is thrilled to...
  • IV FSI Conference: Meet Our Top 6 High Performance in Football Speakers!

    We are excited to introduce the next six distin...
  • FSI Student, Mykhailo Samokhvalov, internship at Boavista FC

    Mykhailo Samokhvalov, hailing from Ukraine, is ...

Categories

  • Conference
  • Expert Opinion
  • Interview
  • Journal: Science & Medicine in Football
  • Lecture
  • News
  • Paper of the week
  • Round table
  • Uncategorized
  • Who is

WEBSITE

  • About us
  • FSI Masters
  • Internships
  • FSI Jobs
  • FSI Lab
  • FAQ
  • Contact

MASTERS

  • FSI Master Football Strength & Conditioning Coach
  • FSI Master Football Doctor
  • FSI Master High-Performance Football Coach
  • FSI Master Football Injury Reconditioning Trainer
  • FSI Football Master Nutritionist
  • FSI Master Football Physiotherapist
  • FSI Master Football Tactical Analyst

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

SOCIAL MEDIA

Avda. del Conocimiento, 41. 18016 Granada (Spain)

© Football Science Institute   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Legal notice   |   Design and development OAK Producciones 

TOP